Public Goods
Public goods
Public goods present a complex challenge for the free market system due to their distinct traits: non-rivalry, non-excludability, and non-rejectability. These are goods or services, such as national defence, public parks, and street lighting, which do not present profit-making opportunities for private enterprises and hence are typically provided by the government or other public entities.
Public goods possess three fundamental attributes:
Non-rivalry: This characteristic means that one person's consumption of the good does not detract from the quantity or quality available to others. For example, one individual's enjoyment of a beautiful public park doesn't preclude another's ability to enjoy it.
Non-excludability: This trait suggests that once the good is provided, it is virtually impossible to stop people from using it, even if they haven't paid for it. This phenomenon leads to what we term 'free-ridership,' where individuals can consume the good without contributing to its cost.
Non-rejectability: This facet of public goods means that once the good is provided, an individual cannot reject its use or consumption. To illustrate, even someone who never visits a public park cannot reject the indirect benefits they derive from it, like improved air quality or enhanced community aesthetics.
Let's use the example of a lighthouse to explain these principles. Once a lighthouse is erected and operational, any ship can utilise its light for navigation, irrespective of whether they contributed to its building or maintenance costs (non-excludability). Simultaneously, one ship using the lighthouse doesn't reduce its usefulness to other ships (non-rivalry). Furthermore, ships cannot opt out from seeing the light from the lighthouse when it's in their line of sight (non-rejectability).
In the free market system, these characteristics create a conundrum. The issues of non-excludability and non-rivalry lead to zero effective demand, and non-rejectability makes it impossible for consumers to opt out of the benefits. Moreover, since the provision of an additional unit of the good costs nothing (suggesting a zero marginal cost), the optimal price for the good would theoretically be zero. As a result, private, profit-seeking firms will be unwilling to supply such goods, leading to an undersupply in relation to societal needs.
Street lights and national defence are prime examples of public goods due to their inherent characteristics of non-rivalry, non-excludability, and non-rejectability.
Street Lights: Street lights exemplify public goods for several reasons:
Non-rivalry: When street lights are turned on at night, one person's use of the light (for visibility, safety) doesn't reduce its availability to others. Every pedestrian or driver can simultaneously benefit without diminishing the light's usefulness.
Non-excludability: It's impractical, if not impossible, to prevent people from benefiting from street lights, whether they've contributed to their maintenance or not. For instance, both tax-paying citizens and tourists can use the illuminated streets at night without distinction.
Non-rejectability: Individuals can't opt-out of the benefits provided by street lights. Even if someone prefers darkness, they can't choose to reject the light on public streets.
National Defence: Similarly, national defence epitomises the concept of public goods:
Non-rivalry: A citizen's "use" or enjoyment of national defence doesn't limit its availability to others. The protection of one person doesn't detract from the security of their fellow citizens.
Non-excludability: It's impossible to exclude individuals within a country from benefiting from national defence, irrespective of whether they pay taxes or not. The military protection covers the entire nation, including non-taxpayers, tourists, and infants.
Non-rejectability: Citizens can't opt out of national defence. Even if they object to certain defence policies or military actions, they still indirectly benefit from the security it provides.
Now, let's address why market failure occurs in these instances. Because of their non-excludability, firms can't prevent 'free riders'—those who consume the good without paying for it—leading to zero effective demand in a free-market system. Moreover, due to non-rivalry, the marginal cost of providing these goods to an additional consumer is virtually zero, meaning the profit-maximising price should also be zero. But private, profit-seeking firms can't operate without generating revenues. Consequently, they have no incentive to supply these goods, leading to the market failing to provide them despite a societal need. This issue results in the necessity for government intervention to ensure the adequate provision of public goods, like street lights and national defence.
Common Misconceptions
One prevalent misconception is that anything labelled 'public' is automatically classified as a public good. However, the designation of a public good is not determined by its name but by its economic characteristics - non-rivalry, non-excludability, and non-rejectability.
Consider public toilets, for example. While 'public' is in the name, they don't qualify as public goods. Firstly, access to public toilets can be easily controlled or restricted, making them excludable. This can be done by blocking off the entrance, requiring a key, or charging a fee.
Secondly, public toilets exhibit rivalry in consumption. This means that when one person is using a toilet cubicle, it's not available for others, making the supply diminishable or rivalrous.
Public libraries also fall into this category. While they are generally open for public use, they can exclude individuals under certain conditions such as not allowing entrance to those with food or without a membership card. Libraries also have a limited number of tables, chairs, and even books. When someone uses these resources, they're temporarily unavailable to others, thereby making them rivalrous in nature.
In conclusion, the terminology can be misleading. Despite the 'public' label, both public toilets and libraries do not meet the economic criteria of non-rivalry and non-excludability, and hence are not truly public goods.
Did you know that Public Goods is commonly tested in the A-Level as an Essay? Are you confident that you can tackle them? If you aren’t, we are here to help:
The 2024 ETG June Holiday Intensive Crashcourse is your key to exam success.
What we offer:
Covering 8 crucial macroeconomics & microeconomics topics which are commonly tested in A Levels
Master a Massive Arsenal of Questions: We'll expose you to a wider variety of exam-style questions than you've ever seen.
Double the Practice, Double the Confidence: In just two intensive days, you'll tackle more essays and case studies than you probably have all year!
Unlock High-Scoring Answers: Learn the secrets to crafting top-notch evaluations that will impress examiners.
Structure Like a Pro: We'll equip you with the skills to dissect questions and write clear, well-structured essay responses.
This Crashcourse is the ultimate shortcut to A-Level Economics domination! Don't miss out - secure your spot today! Register for our Content Crashcourses and Essay & Case Study Bootcamp here!
Take a look at our stunningly curated textbooks, exclusively available for ETG students only:
Curious to find out about the ETG experience? Register for a Trial Lesson now! (P.S. There are free gifts when you join for our Trial Lessons)